Shannon Taylor
CEO/Publisher
Let’s be real: public institutions love to send out press releases when it makes them look good. New building? Award ceremony? Facebook post incoming. But when the questions get uncomfortable, those same officials decide silence is safer.
Here’s the thing: watchdogs don’t roll over. Journalism isn’t about waiting politely for scraps of good news. It’s about pressing for answers, even when those answers make the powerful squirm.
I’ve been through it myself. A public institution I covered blacklisted me from receiving press releases because they didn’t like the stories I was publishing. Their “solution”? Uploading releases to their website and Facebook page so they could say the information was “available to everyone.” Let’s not kid ourselves. That’s not the same thing as fair, equal access. It’s like inviting everyone to dinner but locking half the guests on the porch. Sure, the food’s technically “available,” but don’t pretend it’s hospitality.
And this isn’t just my story. In Memphis, MLK50 editor Wendi Thomas said the city cut her outlet from its media advisory list after critical reporting. That’s not transparency. That’s retaliation with a side of PR spin.
Here’s the kicker: that tactic carries legal consequences. The Tennessee Public Records Act says records must be shared with anyone who requests them. The Open Meetings Act says all public meetings must remain open. And the First Amendment says government can’t play favorites with the press. Try to blacklist a reporter, and suddenly you’re not just hiding information. You may be violating the Constitution.
Posting selective information online doesn’t erase those obligations. Taxpayer-funded settlements, contracts, and budgets are still public. And reporters still have the right, and the tools, to demand them. Funny how the email list works flawlessly when it’s time to brag about ribbon cuttings, but suddenly “technical difficulties” kick in when you ask about lawsuits, budgets, or misconduct.
So when officials refuse to respond, here’s what happens: we document the silence, file the requests they can’t ignore, and tell readers exactly who declined to answer. Because silence speaks volumes. History lesson: officials who try to muzzle the press rarely end up looking noble. Courts don’t like it, taxpayers don’t like it, and voters really don’t like it.
As Thomas Jefferson put it, “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.” That’s why I’ll keep watchdogging. And here’s my own reminder: if public institutions think they can outwait watchdogs with silence, they should remember one thing. Lapdogs may sit quietly. Watchdogs bark louder.
Supporting high-quality local journalism takes community commitment. If you value in-depth reporting on events like these, please consider donating to The Weakley County Examiner. Your contribution helps us continue to cover the stories that matter most to our region.
Make a one-time donation
Make a monthly donation
Make a yearly donation
Choose an amount
Or enter a custom amount
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
Your contribution is appreciated.
DonateDonate monthlyDonate yearly
Leave a Reply to Morgan HiltonCancel reply